Problems We Address
Model-only testing cannot show whether a complete enterprise workflow is safe. An agent may retrieve documents, use identities, call tools, write to business systems, or influence a human decision. Each transition creates a possible attack path or control failure.
Orbyntis tests the complete action chain. Assessments can cover direct and indirect prompt injection, malicious retrieved content, excessive permissions, confused-deputy behavior, sensitive-data disclosure, approval bypass, unsafe tool sequences, and gaps in monitoring or containment.
Engagement Approach
We first define the system boundary, protected assets, expected behavior, and credible adversaries. Test scenarios are then mapped to the actual tools, identities, data sources, and business effects in scope. Findings include reproducible evidence, impact, contributing control gaps, and recommended remediation.
Where appropriate, corrected controls are retested so stakeholders can distinguish a proposed fix from a verified one. Public reporting remains sanitized; detailed evidence is handled through the engagement’s approved security process.
Enterprise Scenarios
- Pre-production assessment of a tool-using internal agent
- Adversarial testing of retrieval-augmented workflows and connected knowledge sources
- Validation of approval gates around sensitive or irreversible actions
- Retesting after changes to prompts, models, tools, permissions, or orchestration
The objective is not a collection of clever prompts. It is evidence about whether the whole workflow remains within its intended authority under realistic pressure.